<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1938 (7) TMI 15 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309855</link>
    <description>Tender of pardon to approvers by a Magistrate under the statutory disclosure condition, followed by their examination, attracted the committal consequences of Section 337. Once that procedure was adopted, Sub-section (2-A) applied and, where reasonable grounds existed to believe the accused guilty, committal for trial to the Court of Session or High Court was required. A later attempt to proceed under Section 494 did not alter the legal character or effect of the earlier pardon procedure. Failure to record reasons was treated as an irregularity, and the Local Government&#039;s internal role did not change the Magistrate&#039;s statutory act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1938 (7) TMI 15 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309855</link>
      <description>Tender of pardon to approvers by a Magistrate under the statutory disclosure condition, followed by their examination, attracted the committal consequences of Section 337. Once that procedure was adopted, Sub-section (2-A) applied and, where reasonable grounds existed to believe the accused guilty, committal for trial to the Court of Session or High Court was required. A later attempt to proceed under Section 494 did not alter the legal character or effect of the earlier pardon procedure. Failure to record reasons was treated as an irregularity, and the Local Government&#039;s internal role did not change the Magistrate&#039;s statutory act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>