<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1124 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443502</link>
    <description>The SC addressed multiple tax-related issues stemming from procedural challenges. The court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of disputed tax amount and file an appeal once the Tribunal is constituted. The judgment emphasized statutory remedies, allowing the petitioner to challenge tax impositions while mandating partial payment and future appeal compliance under the B.G.S.T. Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1124 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443502</link>
      <description>The SC addressed multiple tax-related issues stemming from procedural challenges. The court directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of disputed tax amount and file an appeal once the Tribunal is constituted. The judgment emphasized statutory remedies, allowing the petitioner to challenge tax impositions while mandating partial payment and future appeal compliance under the B.G.S.T. Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>