<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, finding them to be based on vague information and constituting a change of opinion. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, with the reassessment deemed invalid both legally and on merits. The reassessment would have led to double addition of disclosed transactions, and the Tribunal noted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the reassessment. The order was pronounced on 16th May 2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 08:17:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, finding them to be based on vague information and constituting a change of opinion. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, with the reassessment deemed invalid both legally and on merits. The reassessment would have led to double addition of disclosed transactions, and the Tribunal noted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the reassessment. The order was pronounced on 16th May 2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>