https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443479 Under Article 226, provisional attachment and related PMLA proceedings will not ordinarily be interfered with at a premature stage where the competent authority had material to form the requisite satisfaction. The challenge was found to rest largely on disputed questions of fact concerning the University's functioning, alleged fake degrees, and the endowment fund account, which were not suitable for writ adjudication. Earlier judicial findings on those matters were treated as relevant background supporting the impugned action. As no patent jurisdictional defect, absence of reasons to believe, or clear illegality was established, interference in writ jurisdiction was declined and the parties were left to pursue the statutory process under the Act. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2023 08:17:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443479 Under Article 226, provisional attachment and related PMLA proceedings will not ordinarily be interfered with at a premature stage where the competent authority had material to form the requisite satisfaction. The challenge was found to rest largely on disputed questions of fact concerning the University's functioning, alleged fake degrees, and the endowment fund account, which were not suitable for writ adjudication. Earlier judicial findings on those matters were treated as relevant background supporting the impugned action. As no patent jurisdictional defect, absence of reasons to believe, or clear illegality was established, interference in writ jurisdiction was declined and the parties were left to pursue the statutory process under the Act. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443479