<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving rejection of refund claims as time-barred, error in computation of eligible credit, rejection of refund claims for services without nexus to output services, and wrong application of the formula for calculating eligible refund. The Tribunal held that the refund claims were within the time limit, found errors in the computation of eligible credit, allowed refund claims for services without nexus to output services, and directed the recalculating of the correct eligible refund. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving rejection of refund claims as time-barred, error in computation of eligible credit, rejection of refund claims for services without nexus to output services, and wrong application of the formula for calculating eligible refund. The Tribunal held that the refund claims were within the time limit, found errors in the computation of eligible credit, allowed refund claims for services without nexus to output services, and directed the recalculating of the correct eligible refund. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>