<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 199 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34079</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving confiscation of goods and penalty imposition under the Customs Act, 1962. Penalties were upheld on the exporter, CHA, and broker for failing to prevent loading without proper documentation. The shipping line was held accountable for contravening sections 33 and 34 but had the confiscation of goods set aside as they were cleared before detection. Compliance with customs regulations and proper documentation in international trade transactions was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 199 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34079</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving confiscation of goods and penalty imposition under the Customs Act, 1962. Penalties were upheld on the exporter, CHA, and broker for failing to prevent loading without proper documentation. The shipping line was held accountable for contravening sections 33 and 34 but had the confiscation of goods set aside as they were cleared before detection. Compliance with customs regulations and proper documentation in international trade transactions was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>