https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309851 Proved serious misconduct by a judicial officer, including pronouncing operative portions of judgments before the full text was prepared and irregular handling of auction-sale matters, justified dismissal where the enquiry was fair, the findings were not perverse, and natural justice was observed. The Court held that the explanation blaming the stenographer was unsupported and that the conduct was unbecoming of a judicial officer. It also held that the High Court erred in treating the misconduct as non-grave, in finding bias or procedural illegality in the second show cause notice, and in barring further inquiry. The dismissal remained operative and the writ petitions were dismissed. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Sep 2023 10:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309851 Proved serious misconduct by a judicial officer, including pronouncing operative portions of judgments before the full text was prepared and irregular handling of auction-sale matters, justified dismissal where the enquiry was fair, the findings were not perverse, and natural justice was observed. The Court held that the explanation blaming the stenographer was unsupported and that the conduct was unbecoming of a judicial officer. It also held that the High Court erred in treating the misconduct as non-grave, in finding bias or procedural illegality in the second show cause notice, and in barring further inquiry. The dismissal remained operative and the writ petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309851