<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1073 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, setting aside the confiscation of betel nuts and the vehicle, as well as the imposition of penalties. The onus to prove smuggling was deemed not discharged by the Revenue, leading to the rejection of their appeal due to insufficient evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:40:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1073 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, setting aside the confiscation of betel nuts and the vehicle, as well as the imposition of penalties. The onus to prove smuggling was deemed not discharged by the Revenue, leading to the rejection of their appeal due to insufficient evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>