<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1055 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443433</link>
    <description>The petitioners were acquitted of the charges of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the court found that they successfully rebutted the presumption in favor of the complainant by proving fraud and dual employment. The court set aside the conviction and sentence, directing the complainant to refund the amount paid by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:38:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1055 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443433</link>
      <description>The petitioners were acquitted of the charges of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the court found that they successfully rebutted the presumption in favor of the complainant by proving fraud and dual employment. The court set aside the conviction and sentence, directing the complainant to refund the amount paid by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>