<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1050 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443428</link>
    <description>The Madras HC quashed an assessment order for AY 2017-2018 due to violation of natural justice principles. The court found the order was passed without proper notice under Section 169(1)(b) and without considering relevant documents. The HC directed the tax authority to provide a personal hearing, review all evidence, and complete assessment proceedings within eight weeks. The writ petition was allowed without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=727001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1050 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443428</link>
      <description>The Madras HC quashed an assessment order for AY 2017-2018 due to violation of natural justice principles. The court found the order was passed without proper notice under Section 169(1)(b) and without considering relevant documents. The HC directed the tax authority to provide a personal hearing, review all evidence, and complete assessment proceedings within eight weeks. The writ petition was allowed without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>