<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1033 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition made by the AO regarding alleged excess stock-in-trade based on a discrepancy found during a survey at the business premises. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s explanations, including the estimation made under pressure during the survey, and the lack of physical verification due to disruptions. The Tribunal concluded that the addition of excess stock was not justified, distinguishing the case from precedents cited by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1033 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition made by the AO regarding alleged excess stock-in-trade based on a discrepancy found during a survey at the business premises. The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s explanations, including the estimation made under pressure during the survey, and the lack of physical verification due to disruptions. The Tribunal concluded that the addition of excess stock was not justified, distinguishing the case from precedents cited by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>