<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 647 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309821</link>
    <description>Fuel and lubricating oil found in an imported vessel were not accepted as part of the vessel under Heading 89.08 because the authorities recorded concurrent findings that the fuel was not shown to be contained in the engine or machinery in the manner required for such classification. The Tribunal relied on the departmental circular and the World Customs Organisation opinion, which treated only fuel and oil contained in the vessel&#039;s machinery and engines as integral to the vessel. In view of those concurrent factual findings, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose for admission, and the classification claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 647 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309821</link>
      <description>Fuel and lubricating oil found in an imported vessel were not accepted as part of the vessel under Heading 89.08 because the authorities recorded concurrent findings that the fuel was not shown to be contained in the engine or machinery in the manner required for such classification. The Tribunal relied on the departmental circular and the World Customs Organisation opinion, which treated only fuel and oil contained in the vessel&#039;s machinery and engines as integral to the vessel. In view of those concurrent factual findings, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose for admission, and the classification claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>