<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 113 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34065</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the seizure of goods by customs authorities based on suspicion of a fake importer/IEC holder, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments that there were insufficient grounds for confiscation. The court clarified that the seizure was justified on the belief that the imports were made by a fake IEC holder and directed the customs authorities to expedite the investigation while dismissing the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 113 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34065</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the seizure of goods by customs authorities based on suspicion of a fake importer/IEC holder, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments that there were insufficient grounds for confiscation. The court clarified that the seizure was justified on the belief that the imports were made by a fake IEC holder and directed the customs authorities to expedite the investigation while dismissing the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>