<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 829 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309815</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide on the representation for the refund of the additional tax burden within 60 days. The State authorities were urged to consider relevant rules, regulations, guidelines, and agreement conditions in making their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 829 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309815</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide on the representation for the refund of the additional tax burden within 60 days. The State authorities were urged to consider relevant rules, regulations, guidelines, and agreement conditions in making their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>