https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309816 Conviction for murder could not be sustained where the evidence showed no overt act by the appellant in causing the deaths and no common intention to kill was proved; the murder conviction was set aside. The Court reaffirmed that, in an appeal against acquittal, interference is warranted only on substantial and compelling reasons and not because another view is possible. However, the conviction for grievous hurt was upheld because the injured eyewitness gave a consistent account of the appellant assaulting her with a chopper, and that testimony was corroborated by medical evidence of grievous injuries. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:12:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309816 Conviction for murder could not be sustained where the evidence showed no overt act by the appellant in causing the deaths and no common intention to kill was proved; the murder conviction was set aside. The Court reaffirmed that, in an appeal against acquittal, interference is warranted only on substantial and compelling reasons and not because another view is possible. However, the conviction for grievous hurt was upheld because the injured eyewitness gave a consistent account of the appellant assaulting her with a chopper, and that testimony was corroborated by medical evidence of grievous injuries. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309816