<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1004 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443382</link>
    <description>A bail condition requiring deposit of Rs. 2 crores was held to be onerous and inconsistent with the Court&#039;s earlier approach disapproving such restrictive monetary conditions in bail matters. The requirement was therefore set aside, while the remaining bail conditions were left undisturbed. The operative effect was limited to removal of the deposit condition, without disturbing the rest of the bail order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1004 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443382</link>
      <description>A bail condition requiring deposit of Rs. 2 crores was held to be onerous and inconsistent with the Court&#039;s earlier approach disapproving such restrictive monetary conditions in bail matters. The requirement was therefore set aside, while the remaining bail conditions were left undisturbed. The operative effect was limited to removal of the deposit condition, without disturbing the rest of the bail order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>