<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 988 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443366</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the reopening notices dated 25th March 2014 and the consequential orders rejecting objections, finding insufficient application of mind by the AO. The court held that the reasons recorded lacked a reasonable belief of income escaping assessment, deeming them inadequate and indicative of a fishing inquiry. The petitions were allowed, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 988 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443366</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the reopening notices dated 25th March 2014 and the consequential orders rejecting objections, finding insufficient application of mind by the AO. The court held that the reasons recorded lacked a reasonable belief of income escaping assessment, deeming them inadequate and indicative of a fishing inquiry. The petitions were allowed, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>