<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 981 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443359</link>
    <description>The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,08,52,900 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to share capital received from a holding company. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, finding that the Assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transaction with the investor company. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unsustainable and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 981 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443359</link>
      <description>The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,08,52,900 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to share capital received from a holding company. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, finding that the Assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transaction with the investor company. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unsustainable and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>