<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 975 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the extraction of minerals from beach sand qualified as manufacturing under sec 2(29BA). The claimed investment allowance under sec 33AC and additional depreciation under sec 32(1)(ii) were allowed. The Tribunal also determined that no disallowance under sec 14A was necessary due to the absence of exempt income. The appeal was allowed, and the revision of the order by the Principal Commissioner was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 975 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the extraction of minerals from beach sand qualified as manufacturing under sec 2(29BA). The claimed investment allowance under sec 33AC and additional depreciation under sec 32(1)(ii) were allowed. The Tribunal also determined that no disallowance under sec 14A was necessary due to the absence of exempt income. The appeal was allowed, and the revision of the order by the Principal Commissioner was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>