<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 966 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443344</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the transmission of 45,000 equity shares to the deceased&#039;s daughter, as the company wrongly refused based on Will conditions. The interpretation of the Will was deemed irrelevant to the transmission process under the Companies Act. The Tribunal dismissed the influence of a family settlement on the transmission decision, stating it was not within its jurisdiction. The directors lacked standing to oppose the transmission, leading to a cost imposition on them. The NCLT&#039;s decision was upheld, directing the transmission of shares to the daughter within thirty days, and both appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 966 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443344</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the transmission of 45,000 equity shares to the deceased&#039;s daughter, as the company wrongly refused based on Will conditions. The interpretation of the Will was deemed irrelevant to the transmission process under the Companies Act. The Tribunal dismissed the influence of a family settlement on the transmission decision, stating it was not within its jurisdiction. The directors lacked standing to oppose the transmission, leading to a cost imposition on them. The NCLT&#039;s decision was upheld, directing the transmission of shares to the daughter within thirty days, and both appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>