<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 963 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443341</link>
    <description>An application under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 must comply with the Act and its prescribed Rules, which constitute a self-contained special procedure. The Bombay HC held that Section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not override that scheme, and the Act&#039;s overriding clause gives it primacy where the special procedure applies. Verification stating that the contents were true and correct to the best of the deponent&#039;s knowledge derived from records was treated as sufficient disclosure of the source of knowledge. On that basis, the application was found to satisfy the prescribed form and verification requirements, and the objection based on absence of a separate affidavit under the CrPC was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:09:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 963 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443341</link>
      <description>An application under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 must comply with the Act and its prescribed Rules, which constitute a self-contained special procedure. The Bombay HC held that Section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not override that scheme, and the Act&#039;s overriding clause gives it primacy where the special procedure applies. Verification stating that the contents were true and correct to the best of the deponent&#039;s knowledge derived from records was treated as sufficient disclosure of the source of knowledge. On that basis, the application was found to satisfy the prescribed form and verification requirements, and the objection based on absence of a separate affidavit under the CrPC was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>