https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309807 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappreciate the evidence under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, but the presumption of innocence is reinforced by the acquittal. Interference is justified only where the trial court's view is demonstrably unsustainable or a miscarriage of justice would result; if two reasonable views are possible, the one favouring the accused ordinarily prevails. Applying that principle, the High Court's acquittal was treated as a possible view on the evidence and was not disturbed, so the State's appeal failed and the acquittal stood confirmed. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2023 17:26:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309807 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappreciate the evidence under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, but the presumption of innocence is reinforced by the acquittal. Interference is justified only where the trial court's view is demonstrably unsustainable or a miscarriage of justice would result; if two reasonable views are possible, the one favouring the accused ordinarily prevails. Applying that principle, the High Court's acquittal was treated as a possible view on the evidence and was not disturbed, so the State's appeal failed and the acquittal stood confirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309807