https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34055 The court dismissed the writ petition regarding ownership of seized silver bars, citing lack of involvement of the individual claiming ownership, significant delay in claiming interest on assets, incorrect jurisdiction choice, inapplicability of relevant legal provisions, and specificity of interest payment rules. The court emphasized that a writ petition was not the appropriate remedy, suggesting a civil suit for recovery of money instead. en-us Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34055 The court dismissed the writ petition regarding ownership of seized silver bars, citing lack of involvement of the individual claiming ownership, significant delay in claiming interest on assets, incorrect jurisdiction choice, inapplicability of relevant legal provisions, and specificity of interest payment rules. The court emphasized that a writ petition was not the appropriate remedy, suggesting a civil suit for recovery of money instead. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34055