https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309801 A foreign anti-suit injunction could not be enforced to stop prosecution of an Indian patent infringement suit maintainable only before the competent Indian court. The Delhi High Court noted that the Wuhan proceedings concerned a broader global FRAND dispute, while the Indian action concerned infringement of specified Indian patents, so the foreign order could not defeat domestic adjudicatory jurisdiction. Because the foreign injunction was obtained without fair disclosure and operated oppressively, anti-enforcement relief was granted. The court also directed protection against any coercive fine linked to continued Indian proceedings, requiring the defendants to secure the amount so the plaintiffs would be indemnified if enforcement was attempted. en-us Mon, 03 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2023 17:25:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309801 A foreign anti-suit injunction could not be enforced to stop prosecution of an Indian patent infringement suit maintainable only before the competent Indian court. The Delhi High Court noted that the Wuhan proceedings concerned a broader global FRAND dispute, while the Indian action concerned infringement of specified Indian patents, so the foreign order could not defeat domestic adjudicatory jurisdiction. Because the foreign injunction was obtained without fair disclosure and operated oppressively, anti-enforcement relief was granted. The court also directed protection against any coercive fine linked to continued Indian proceedings, requiring the defendants to secure the amount so the plaintiffs would be indemnified if enforcement was attempted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309801