https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309790 An acquittal in a murder prosecution was upheld because the prosecution evidence was materially inconsistent with the medical opinion on the time and manner of occurrence, the nature of injuries, the deceased's ability to speak after the assault, and the number of shots fired. The eyewitness account and alleged oral dying declaration did not overcome those contradictions, and the High Court had given cogent reasons for doubting the prosecution case. The acquittal was therefore not shown to be perverse or unreasonable, and no interference was warranted in appeal. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:27:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309790 An acquittal in a murder prosecution was upheld because the prosecution evidence was materially inconsistent with the medical opinion on the time and manner of occurrence, the nature of injuries, the deceased's ability to speak after the assault, and the number of shots fired. The eyewitness account and alleged oral dying declaration did not overcome those contradictions, and the High Court had given cogent reasons for doubting the prosecution case. The acquittal was therefore not shown to be perverse or unreasonable, and no interference was warranted in appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309790