https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309788 Interference with an acquittal under Article 136 is confined to exceptional cases where the lower court's appreciation of evidence is perverse, unreasonable, or has ignored vital material. Mere disagreement with the view taken on evidence does not justify reappraisal. On the facts discussed, the prosecution evidence was found insufficient to dislodge the High Court's acquittal, and the material relied upon did not establish criminal conspiracy or extortion beyond reasonable doubt. The challenge therefore failed because no error or miscarriage of justice in the acquittal was shown. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:18:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309788 Interference with an acquittal under Article 136 is confined to exceptional cases where the lower court's appreciation of evidence is perverse, unreasonable, or has ignored vital material. Mere disagreement with the view taken on evidence does not justify reappraisal. On the facts discussed, the prosecution evidence was found insufficient to dislodge the High Court's acquittal, and the material relied upon did not establish criminal conspiracy or extortion beyond reasonable doubt. The challenge therefore failed because no error or miscarriage of justice in the acquittal was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309788