https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309780 Eyewitness testimony was found unsafe where the witnesses were not local residents, their presence at the scene was unusual, and their accounts contained material contradictions and improbabilities about the assault and firing. The alleged recovery of the firearm was also rejected because prior search had not found it, the panch witness did not support the prosecution, and the recovery was not satisfactorily proved. In an appeal against acquittal, the Court reiterated that interference is justified only when the trial court's view is perverse or unsupported by record. As the trial court's assessment was reasonable, the reversal of acquittal was held unsustainable and the conviction was set aside. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:24:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309780 Eyewitness testimony was found unsafe where the witnesses were not local residents, their presence at the scene was unusual, and their accounts contained material contradictions and improbabilities about the assault and firing. The alleged recovery of the firearm was also rejected because prior search had not found it, the panch witness did not support the prosecution, and the recovery was not satisfactorily proved. In an appeal against acquittal, the Court reiterated that interference is justified only when the trial court's view is perverse or unsupported by record. As the trial court's assessment was reasonable, the reversal of acquittal was held unsustainable and the conviction was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309780