https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309767 Bail already granted should not be cancelled mechanically, because cancellation stands on a different footing from rejection at the first instance. Cancellation is justified only where there is interference with justice, attempted evasion, misuse of the concession, absconding risk, tampering with evidence or witnesses, or where the bail order is perverse, illegal, or based on irrelevant considerations while ignoring relevant material. On the facts, the immediate challenge after grant of bail, without material showing misuse, witness intimidation, or failure of the bail conditions, did not justify withdrawal of liberty. The request for cancellation of bail was therefore rejected. en-us Wed, 06 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:30:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309767 Bail already granted should not be cancelled mechanically, because cancellation stands on a different footing from rejection at the first instance. Cancellation is justified only where there is interference with justice, attempted evasion, misuse of the concession, absconding risk, tampering with evidence or witnesses, or where the bail order is perverse, illegal, or based on irrelevant considerations while ignoring relevant material. On the facts, the immediate challenge after grant of bail, without material showing misuse, witness intimidation, or failure of the bail conditions, did not justify withdrawal of liberty. The request for cancellation of bail was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 06 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309767