<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1394 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309763</link>
    <description>Cancellation of anticipatory bail requires stricter scrutiny than refusal of bail and will be ordered only on supervening circumstances, serious infirmity in the bail order, or material showing abuse of liberty such as tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The respondents had joined investigation, cooperated with the investigating agency, and no custodial interrogation was found necessary. The opening of lockers in the presence of the investigating officer did not, on the record, justify interference. As the bail order was reasoned and no compelling ground for cancellation was shown, the request to cancel the existing anticipatory bail was rejected and the bail order left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1394 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309763</link>
      <description>Cancellation of anticipatory bail requires stricter scrutiny than refusal of bail and will be ordered only on supervening circumstances, serious infirmity in the bail order, or material showing abuse of liberty such as tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The respondents had joined investigation, cooperated with the investigating agency, and no custodial interrogation was found necessary. The opening of lockers in the presence of the investigating officer did not, on the record, justify interference. As the bail order was reasoned and no compelling ground for cancellation was shown, the request to cancel the existing anticipatory bail was rejected and the bail order left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>