<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1307 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation for demanding interest on duty paid through supplementary invoices was not applicable as the duty payment information was already disclosed to the department. Therefore, the demand for interest beyond the normal limitation period was set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the demand for payment of interest within the regular limitation period as the appellant had already paid interest within that timeframe. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1307 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation for demanding interest on duty paid through supplementary invoices was not applicable as the duty payment information was already disclosed to the department. Therefore, the demand for interest beyond the normal limitation period was set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the demand for payment of interest within the regular limitation period as the appellant had already paid interest within that timeframe. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>