https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309764 In bail matters under Section 439 CrPC, the Court reiterated that discretion turns on the nature and gravity of the accusation, the evidence, the accused's relationship with the victim or witnesses, the risk of absconding, and the possibility of tampering with evidence. On the facts, prior contact between the parties, the complainant's travel to Hyderabad, and the delay in lodging the complaint supported the grant of bail. For cancellation, the Court held that very cogent and overwhelming supervening circumstances are required, such as abuse of liberty or interference with justice. No such circumstance was shown, so the challenge failed, though the bond amount was enhanced. en-us Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309764 In bail matters under Section 439 CrPC, the Court reiterated that discretion turns on the nature and gravity of the accusation, the evidence, the accused's relationship with the victim or witnesses, the risk of absconding, and the possibility of tampering with evidence. On the facts, prior contact between the parties, the complainant's travel to Hyderabad, and the delay in lodging the complaint supported the grant of bail. For cancellation, the Court held that very cogent and overwhelming supervening circumstances are required, such as abuse of liberty or interference with justice. No such circumstance was shown, so the challenge failed, though the bond amount was enhanced. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309764