<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1505 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to re-compute the Arm&#039;s Length Price based on the given order. Metro Shoes Ltd. and Sreeleathers Ltd. were excluded as comparables in favor of the assessee. The margin corrections for VF Brands India Pvt. Ltd. and Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Pvt. Ltd. were remanded back to the TPO for reconsideration. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1505 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to re-compute the Arm&#039;s Length Price based on the given order. Metro Shoes Ltd. and Sreeleathers Ltd. were excluded as comparables in favor of the assessee. The margin corrections for VF Brands India Pvt. Ltd. and Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Pvt. Ltd. were remanded back to the TPO for reconsideration. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>