<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34048</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Central Government&#039;s order dated 30-1-2006 regarding the petitioner. The court noted the inconsistency in the Central Government&#039;s reasoning and held that the Customs authorities lacked jurisdiction in the absence of a proper determination under FEMA. The respondents were granted liberty to refer the matter to the appropriate authorities under FEMA for suitable adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34048</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Central Government&#039;s order dated 30-1-2006 regarding the petitioner. The court noted the inconsistency in the Central Government&#039;s reasoning and held that the Customs authorities lacked jurisdiction in the absence of a proper determination under FEMA. The respondents were granted liberty to refer the matter to the appropriate authorities under FEMA for suitable adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>