https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309765 The Supreme Court declined to cancel the bail granted to the respondent-accused by the ASJ, Patiala House Court, New Delhi, which was affirmed by the Delhi High Court. Specific conditions were imposed, including weekly appearances before the Investigating Officer, surrender of travel documents, and restrictions on obtaining new documents without permission. The respondent-accused must strictly adhere to these conditions, with the State having the liberty to seek bail cancellation for non-compliance. The judgment emphasizes accountability and provides a mechanism for legal action in case of breaches. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:30:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309765 The Supreme Court declined to cancel the bail granted to the respondent-accused by the ASJ, Patiala House Court, New Delhi, which was affirmed by the Delhi High Court. Specific conditions were imposed, including weekly appearances before the Investigating Officer, surrender of travel documents, and restrictions on obtaining new documents without permission. The respondent-accused must strictly adhere to these conditions, with the State having the liberty to seek bail cancellation for non-compliance. The judgment emphasizes accountability and provides a mechanism for legal action in case of breaches. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309765