<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 956 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443334</link>
    <description>An adjudication order under the GST law is unsustainable where it records a demand for interest and penalty but does not disclose reasons or deal with the taxpayer&#039;s reply and material submissions. Such an order reflects non-application of mind and is liable to be quashed. The Department may, however, be permitted to commence fresh proceedings by issuing a fresh show cause notice and adjudicating the matter again in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 956 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443334</link>
      <description>An adjudication order under the GST law is unsustainable where it records a demand for interest and penalty but does not disclose reasons or deal with the taxpayer&#039;s reply and material submissions. Such an order reflects non-application of mind and is liable to be quashed. The Department may, however, be permitted to commence fresh proceedings by issuing a fresh show cause notice and adjudicating the matter again in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>