https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34045 The case involved appeals against penalties imposed on SAP for clandestine clearances under the Central Excise Act. SAP contested the simultaneous imposition of penalties under different sections for the same transaction. The Commissioner reduced some fines but upheld duty demands. SAP challenged fines on excisable goods and liability of the truck for confiscation. The fines and penalties on the vehicle owner and driver were also contested, with the Tribunal holding them liable due to awareness of goods being transported. The appeals by revenue and SAP were partly allowed, while others were dismissed. en-us Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34045 The case involved appeals against penalties imposed on SAP for clandestine clearances under the Central Excise Act. SAP contested the simultaneous imposition of penalties under different sections for the same transaction. The Commissioner reduced some fines but upheld duty demands. SAP challenged fines on excisable goods and liability of the truck for confiscation. The fines and penalties on the vehicle owner and driver were also contested, with the Tribunal holding them liable due to awareness of goods being transported. The appeals by revenue and SAP were partly allowed, while others were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34045