<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 930 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s belief that the date of cheque issuance was relevant for tax purposes was supported by Supreme Court judgments. As there was no willful suppression or intent to evade tax, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. The Tribunal found the demand time-barred and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:28:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 930 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s belief that the date of cheque issuance was relevant for tax purposes was supported by Supreme Court judgments. As there was no willful suppression or intent to evade tax, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. The Tribunal found the demand time-barred and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>