<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 313 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by Revenue, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals and the finality of orders in the context of refund claims. The decision highlighted the need for adherence to legal procedures and the significance of challenging orders promptly to avoid complications in claiming refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 313 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by Revenue, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals and the finality of orders in the context of refund claims. The decision highlighted the need for adherence to legal procedures and the significance of challenging orders promptly to avoid complications in claiming refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>