<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 924 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the rectification of the tax order was not based on apparent error and required detailed analysis, rendering it unsuitable for rectification under Section 74. The penalty issue was deemed to necessitate further consideration along with the service tax demand, resulting in a remand for a denovo adjudication order. The appellant&#039;s appeal concerning the penalty was to be decided in conjunction with the service tax demand, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:28:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 924 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the rectification of the tax order was not based on apparent error and required detailed analysis, rendering it unsuitable for rectification under Section 74. The penalty issue was deemed to necessitate further consideration along with the service tax demand, resulting in a remand for a denovo adjudication order. The appellant&#039;s appeal concerning the penalty was to be decided in conjunction with the service tax demand, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>