<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 916 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443294</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed on the appellant for allegedly aiding another company in evading Central Excise duty was set aside by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found the penalty premature as another show cause notice against the appellant&#039;s company for similar charges was pending adjudication. The case was remanded for further consideration based on the outcome of the pending show cause notice against the appellant&#039;s company, emphasizing the need to await the conclusion of those proceedings before determining liability. The appellant&#039;s argument was supported by legal precedents, and the appeal was allowed for re-examination of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 916 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443294</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed on the appellant for allegedly aiding another company in evading Central Excise duty was set aside by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found the penalty premature as another show cause notice against the appellant&#039;s company for similar charges was pending adjudication. The case was remanded for further consideration based on the outcome of the pending show cause notice against the appellant&#039;s company, emphasizing the need to await the conclusion of those proceedings before determining liability. The appellant&#039;s argument was supported by legal precedents, and the appeal was allowed for re-examination of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>