<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 915 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443293</link>
    <description>In Excise Appeal No. 396 of 2006, the Tribunal ruled that in a revenue neutral scenario where duty paid is eligible as cenvat credit, no interest is payable on Central Excise duty confirmed for the period January, 2000 to December, 2004. The demand for interest was set aside based on this principle. In Excise Appeal No. 914 of 2011, despite a resolution by the Committee of Disputes (COD) indicating revenue neutrality, the revenue department pursued recovery of duty on goods cleared to job workers. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal for recovery as the appellant did not contest the demand confirmation, leading to rejection of refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 915 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443293</link>
      <description>In Excise Appeal No. 396 of 2006, the Tribunal ruled that in a revenue neutral scenario where duty paid is eligible as cenvat credit, no interest is payable on Central Excise duty confirmed for the period January, 2000 to December, 2004. The demand for interest was set aside based on this principle. In Excise Appeal No. 914 of 2011, despite a resolution by the Committee of Disputes (COD) indicating revenue neutrality, the revenue department pursued recovery of duty on goods cleared to job workers. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal for recovery as the appellant did not contest the demand confirmation, leading to rejection of refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>