<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1131 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309759</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the addition of Rs. 6,00,000 for non-deduction of TDS u/s 40a(i)(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The ITAT upheld the decision, stating that since no revenue expenditure was claimed and TDS was deducted in the subsequent year, the amount cannot be disallowed under section 40a(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1131 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309759</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to delete the addition of Rs. 6,00,000 for non-deduction of TDS u/s 40a(i)(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The ITAT upheld the decision, stating that since no revenue expenditure was claimed and TDS was deducted in the subsequent year, the amount cannot be disallowed under section 40a(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>