<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1574 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309755</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, recording no reasons beyond its view that no interference was warranted. It nevertheless exercised discretion to extend the time for making the required pre-deposit, allowing deposit up to 31 October 2013. The operative effect is that the petitions did not proceed, but the parties received additional time to comply with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1574 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309755</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, recording no reasons beyond its view that no interference was warranted. It nevertheless exercised discretion to extend the time for making the required pre-deposit, allowing deposit up to 31 October 2013. The operative effect is that the petitions did not proceed, but the parties received additional time to comply with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>