https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309754 Cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC requires cogent and overwhelming circumstances showing perversity, serious infirmity, abuse of discretion, or supervening conduct undermining a fair trial. On the facts, the accused had already remained in custody for the maximum permissible period, cooperated with investigation, and was subject to stringent bail conditions; no post-bail attempt to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence was shown. The alleged forgery was said to have occurred before arrest. In the absence of any supervening circumstance or illegality in the bail order, the request for cancellation of bail was rejected. en-us Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:16:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309754 Cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC requires cogent and overwhelming circumstances showing perversity, serious infirmity, abuse of discretion, or supervening conduct undermining a fair trial. On the facts, the accused had already remained in custody for the maximum permissible period, cooperated with investigation, and was subject to stringent bail conditions; no post-bail attempt to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence was shown. The alleged forgery was said to have occurred before arrest. In the absence of any supervening circumstance or illegality in the bail order, the request for cancellation of bail was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309754