<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Dropped: AO Accepts 75% of Expenses, No Evidence of Clandestine Business Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72116</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s. 271 (1)(c) - Allegation of engaged in business of providing accommodation entries - if the AO was of the opinion that the assessee is engaged in a clandestine business then he ought not to have allowed 75% of the expenses and instead should have disallowed the entire expenditure. The action of the AO shows that he was satisfied with the genuineness of 75% of the expense - No penalty - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:34:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:55:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Dropped: AO Accepts 75% of Expenses, No Evidence of Clandestine Business Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72116</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s. 271 (1)(c) - Allegation of engaged in business of providing accommodation entries - if the AO was of the opinion that the assessee is engaged in a clandestine business then he ought not to have allowed 75% of the expenses and instead should have disallowed the entire expenditure. The action of the AO shows that he was satisfied with the genuineness of 75% of the expense - No penalty - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:34:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>