<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 887 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision that expenses wrongly treated as income were actually allowable expenses of the assessee, not undeclared income. The rectificatory order under section 154 was deemed invalid due to procedural irregularities, including lack of opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The judgment emphasizes the correct classification of expenses and income, stressing procedural fairness and the right of the assessee to present their case effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 887 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision that expenses wrongly treated as income were actually allowable expenses of the assessee, not undeclared income. The rectificatory order under section 154 was deemed invalid due to procedural irregularities, including lack of opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The judgment emphasizes the correct classification of expenses and income, stressing procedural fairness and the right of the assessee to present their case effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>