https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443253 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the imported goods used in the loan licensee's factory on behalf of the appellant met the end-use condition. The Tribunal held that the appellant's actions complied with the Customs Rules and that the longer limitation period under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, did not apply. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, based on precedent and the appellant's compliance with necessary procedures. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:39:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443253 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the imported goods used in the loan licensee's factory on behalf of the appellant met the end-use condition. The Tribunal held that the appellant's actions complied with the Customs Rules and that the longer limitation period under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, did not apply. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, based on precedent and the appellant's compliance with necessary procedures. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443253