<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 869 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for fresh adjudication on the appellant&#039;s eligibility for refund under Notification No. 41/2012-S.T. The Tribunal set aside the decision allowing claims under a different notification, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of claims under the correct notification despite procedural lapses. The case highlighted the importance of adhering to specific refund provisions and ensuring claims are made in accordance with the relevant notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 869 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for fresh adjudication on the appellant&#039;s eligibility for refund under Notification No. 41/2012-S.T. The Tribunal set aside the decision allowing claims under a different notification, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of claims under the correct notification despite procedural lapses. The case highlighted the importance of adhering to specific refund provisions and ensuring claims are made in accordance with the relevant notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>