<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 864 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of bus parts, regarding their eligibility for exemptions under Notification No. 6/2006-CE and 12/2012-CE. It was determined that the appellants had indeed acquired ownership of the chassis from another manufacturer, thus meeting the conditions for exemption. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the extended period of limitation invoked by the department was unjustified as there was no suppression of facts by the appellants. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellants were granted relief, affirming their eligibility for exemptions and rejecting the extended period of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:39:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 864 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, manufacturers of bus parts, regarding their eligibility for exemptions under Notification No. 6/2006-CE and 12/2012-CE. It was determined that the appellants had indeed acquired ownership of the chassis from another manufacturer, thus meeting the conditions for exemption. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the extended period of limitation invoked by the department was unjustified as there was no suppression of facts by the appellants. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellants were granted relief, affirming their eligibility for exemptions and rejecting the extended period of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>