<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 1087 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309735</link>
    <description>Acceptance of resignation by a Border Security Force member does not, by itself, create a pension right. Section 8 of the Border Security Force Act restricts resignation during engagement, and Rule 19 of the Border Security Force Rules allows resignation in special circumstances but does not confer pensionary entitlement. Under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, pension depends on retirement in recognised modes and qualifying service; Rule 26 treats resignation as forfeiting past service unless an exception applies, while Rule 49 is only a computation provision. The Government order dated 27.12.1995 was treated as merely clarificatory and could not enlarge pension rights beyond the statutory rules, so members resigning before qualifying service were not entitled to pension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 18:13:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 1087 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309735</link>
      <description>Acceptance of resignation by a Border Security Force member does not, by itself, create a pension right. Section 8 of the Border Security Force Act restricts resignation during engagement, and Rule 19 of the Border Security Force Rules allows resignation in special circumstances but does not confer pensionary entitlement. Under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, pension depends on retirement in recognised modes and qualifying service; Rule 26 treats resignation as forfeiting past service unless an exception applies, while Rule 49 is only a computation provision. The Government order dated 27.12.1995 was treated as merely clarificatory and could not enlarge pension rights beyond the statutory rules, so members resigning before qualifying service were not entitled to pension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>